Britain’s Trade Remedies Authority is set to bolster the country’s trade defenses, with new chiefs vowing to toughen measures even before upcoming legislation grants the body greater power to combat global trade instability.
The government has criticised the Trade Remedies Authority (TRA), established after Brexit, for its “slow and unwieldy” remedies system.
There is a desire for changes to this system to offer better protection to industries amidst ongoing trade conflicts, such as US tariffs, according to a Reuters report.
TRA’s chief executives, Jessica Blakely and Carmen Suarez, stated in the report that the organisation could immediately implement measures to enhance its agility and assertiveness.
This comes as new legislation is being developed to modify the TRA’s policy guidance and operational structure.
Suarez, who began her job-share role with Blakely in June, stated that significant progress is achievable even without new legislation. She emphasised that they are not looking to legislation as a definitive solution.
Leveraging additional tools for proactive TRA
The TRA is responsible for monitoring trade flows and data. This allows them to investigate unfair trading practices and propose appropriate countermeasures.
In an upcoming TRA Forum event, Blakely will discuss his views on how the TRA can improve its efficiency.
He suggests the TRA should implement provisional measures more swiftly during investigations, integrate artificial intelligence, and leverage a new monitoring tool.
Additionally, he recommends proactive engagement with firms to address emerging trends effectively.
Blakely said:
(The changes) are all aiming at being more assertive…more forward-leaning and having a lot more tools available to us.
The TRA operates with a specific mandate that distinguishes it from other governmental bodies involved in international trade.
Crucially, the TRA is not a participant in political tariff negotiations. This means that agreements such as the one struck between Britain and the United States in May, which addressed tariffs on certain goods, fall outside the TRA’s purview.
Such negotiations are typically the domain of government departments or ministries responsible for broader trade policy and diplomatic relations.
Despite its non-involvement in political negotiations, the TRA’s work is far from insulated from politically sensitive sectors.
TRA defends role
TRA’s responsibilities often extend to industries that are of significant national importance, face intense international competition, or are deemed strategically vital. Steel is a prime example of such an industry.
The steel sector is frequently subject to trade disputes, including those related to dumping (selling goods at unfairly low prices) or subsidies (government financial assistance that distorts trade).
When these issues arise, the TRA’s role is to conduct independent investigations and determine whether unfair trade practices are harming domestic industries.
In June, the government implemented more stringent protective measures for steel than those recommended by the TRA. This decision followed concerns from steelmakers that the TRA’s proposals would be insufficient to safeguard the industry.
Suarez supported the broader considerations taken by ministers, contrasting them with the TRA’s specific role of evidence analysis. She viewed this as a sign of the ecosystem’s strength, not a weakness.
Suarez stated that although the extent of legislative changes to the TRA would be a political decision, the government was committed to World Trade Organization rules.
She added that “lots of what is in our mandate is intrinsically linked with WTO obligations.”
The post Britain’s trade remedies authority vows tougher stance amid instability appeared first on Invezz
